Up Close: Bonnie Libby

Up Close: Bonnie Libby 

Advertisement


All Advertisers

Although she tries to avoid the “mom role” that might come with being one of the few female professors on campus, Patrick Henry College literature professor Bonnie Libby said she enjoys students stopping by her office and chatting over a cup of tea.

As of yet unmarried with no children of her own, Libby was born in Texas but grew up in Rochester, N.Y. Now a Leesburg resident, she has a Ph.D. in English from the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. PHC is not Libby’s first experience at a small, private Christian school: Her undergraduate degree is from Oral Roberts University in south Tulsa, Okla.

Among the courses she teaches currently are Western literature and British literature. This summer, she taught a class on C.S. Lewis that she mostly conducted online. The class kicked off, however, with a trip to England and Scotland.

In this e-mail interview, Libby shared with us her thoughts on teaching students who were homeschooled before coming to college, her faith and unveiling the truths of literature.

Q: Why did you come to Patrick Henry College?

A: I had looked at the school’s Web site a year before I applied for the literature position and was intrigued by it. The school seemed to have a clear vision for Christian development and training in young people, along with an emphasis on the classical liberal arts. And I was drawn to the mission of the college, that here was a place that was unapologetic about making a difference in our society and culture.

But really it was God leading me here and opening up the position. His guidance was very clear.

Q: You used to teach high school students before you came to PHC. How is it different teaching students who were mostly homeschooled during their primary and secondary education?

A: There is something distinctive about homeschooled students. Most are more confident and quick to take initiative, which I love. There are some unique characters, which I also love. Most PHC students pursue their interests without apology or concern over “fitting in” and that makes them challenging and incredibly fun to be around. To say PHC is a campus full of young people entirely devoid of self-consciousness would be false, but there is a refreshing spirit of passionate sincerity coupled with intelligence.

Q: How does your faith influence your teaching of literature?

A: As a reader of literature, I see God’s truth all around. But I also see that great literature has the potential to express truth in a more concrete, potent way. Great books, the “classics,” have stood the test of time because they accurately portray truths about human nature, about how the universe operates, about God. And these books do this by pleasing the imagination through beautiful language while they teach the mind and heart through substance, making us as readers more receptive to the spiritual realities that exist even though expressed in a fictional world.

So, how does my Christian faith affect my teaching? I cannot imagine teaching without a firm foundation in scriptural truth. Plato once said that teaching is a species of friendship, whose highest degree is love, in which persons see each other as integral parts of something greater. I agree with him. It sounds impossibly idealistic, but I like to think that my desire to teach is motivated by love — love for my subject, love for learning, love for the truth, love for my students, love for the God who created us all.

Q: Some of your students come from socially conservative backgrounds. With that in mind, can you tell us how you address suggestive or controversial content in literature?

A: I actually spend a number of classes addressing this head on in my Western literature course for freshmen and sophomores. We talk about how great books will have very little of this “questionable content” that does not serve a purpose, often a very moral purpose. I talk about Samuel Johnson’s maxim that in literature, vice is necessary to be shown, but it must always disgust.

At the same time we talk about the constant allure of sin, and that too often vice (especially our own) does not disgust us. Good literature should illuminate this human tendency and make us care to correct it. Certainly, literature often depicts the baser aspects of human nature; otherwise it wouldn’t be true. But many times we Christians get hung up on the obvious vices like profanity or sexual immorality, while dismissing more prevalent and pernicious moral evils like pride, superiority and envy.

More Up Close

Up Close features Loudoun County residents and their jobs, their interests and their experiences in their communities. Suggest someone for our weekly Up Close feature by emailing us at loudounextra@wpni.com with their name and why you think they stand out.

Q: College campuses have changed greatly in the last several years, with the advent of many new technologies that students use and in the kinds of things they expect from their professors and programs. What has changed the most since you were an undergraduate?

A: The Internet has struck! I hear students complaining about fritzed out computers that ate all their papers, but I had no such problems when I was an undergraduate. Laptops were just a gleam in some engineer’s eye! There were computers around, and some fellow students had word processors, but I somehow managed an entire degree with my trusty electric typewriter.

Professors had slides, not PowerPoint presentations. Probably the biggest difference is the almost immediate and constant communication through e-mail.

Q: What is the most controversial book you have included in your syllabus, and why was it controversial?

A: Well, there are always the usual books that are controversial because of subject matter that’s a bit bawdy or crude, like Aristophanes’ “Clouds” or Chaucer’s “Wife of Bath’s Tale,” but some of the best discussions have come from studying books like “Waiting for Godot” or even “Moby Dick” that are written in styles not immediately familiar or accessible to students.

Students wanted to challenge the notion that “Moby Dick” is the “great American classic,” and we had a terrific discussion about whether the novel was a classic just because it’s so long and wandering that people assume it’s great and keep assigning it as an “important work,” or whether there really is a transcendent quality to the story that makes it great.

Q: Back in 2005-06, there was a high turnover of faculty at PHC because of conflicts between the faculty and administration. How have those conflicts affected you?

A: I did begin at PHC in fall 2005, and sort of came in on the middle of the conflicts. Much of it seemed to be interpersonal conflicts. It’s made me realize that even “idyllic” places like PHC can have problems. I was certainly sad to see the way it shook out, but the situation had reached an impasse. I think the school is stronger for it, in the long run.

Q: What is it like to be one of a few female professors at the college?

A: A little lonely at times, but it can be fun, too. I tend to be a little quiet in faculty meetings where lots of “dominant males” go at it, but they are all gentlemen and very collegial.

Q: After finals are over, what knowledge do you want your students to walk away with?

A: I want my students to walk away with a greater appreciation for literature as an art form and as a relevant source of wisdom about life. I want them to have their sensibilities awakened by fine language and metaphor and imagery, by the beauty of a scene depicted in literature. I hope my course has helped train their emotions, even in a small way, toward the Good and helped them acquire a taste for beauty.

Q: Tell us a little bit about your family life.

I’m not married, no kids. It’s not that I’ve chosen career over family; it’s just what God seems to have for me for now. I would love to have a family, sooner rather than later, but I’m trying to be patient. It would be difficult to do this job full-tilt and have a family, but I think the college would be flexible if that were to happen.

Q: Tell us a little bit about where you live. What is your favorite thing about living in Loudoun County?

A: I’ve lived in Leesburg since moving to the area in July 2005. It was an adjustment living in such a small town (having lived in Denver and Greensboro before this). Although compared to Purcellville, Leesburg is quite the metropolis! I’m still renting, but looking for just the right place to buy.

I live about five minutes from my church, Potomac Hills Presbyterian, and I love being close to fellow members and friends.

I continue to be astonished at the amount of traffic in seemingly small towns like Leesburg and Purcellville, but it is really nice to be close to Washington, D.C. I can drive in to the Metro on a Saturday and spend the day with friends seeing museums and monuments and enjoying great restaurants.

Plus, there is beautiful countryside and opportunities for outdoor recreation in Loudoun County, a sort of “away from it all” feel if you go a little bit into the country.

Q: Tell us something about yourself that might surprise your students.

A: I am teaching children’s church at my church in Leesburg once a month, and it’s amazing that a room full of college students scares me far less than a bunch of 5-year-olds who are long on energy and short on attention!

Tagged: patrick henry college, Purcellville, religion, Up Close

Comments:

Note: LoudounExtra.com does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Peruse our reader agreement and privacy policy

Before the lefty moonbats start commenting about how PHC being a conclave of "right-wing nut jobs", I'd like to thank Prof. Libby for being such a dedicated teacher who really seems to care about her students. I wish I had professors like you instead of the Marxist/socialist leftovers from the sixties I encountered when I was in school.

Posted by Dingus2 (anonymous) on September 23, 2008 at 7:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)

It would have been nice if the Washington Post would have asked some actual hard questions of this professor. It's not too long ago Patrick Henry College dismissed a number of its professors because said professors pushed for academic freedom. Seems like the Post is trying to make friends here. Interesting.

Posted by louiebird (anonymous) on September 23, 2008 at 9:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Bravo! Great article, great professor! This is the PHC I know and love. I appreciate the professonal integrity of accurate, unbiased reporting for a change.

Posted by cebanks54 (anonymous) on September 23, 2008 at 11:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)

And by integrity I'm sure you mean not asking probing, difficult questions.

Posted by louiebird (anonymous) on September 23, 2008 at 2:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Great article! The journalist doesn't have an agenda or an ax to grind. She's written a simple profile of the dedicated, kind, positive teacher that Dr. Libby is.
-A former student

Posted by pschellhase (anonymous) on September 23, 2008 at 5:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)

As a former student of Dr. Libby, I really enjoyed this article. It reflected her well and also taught me a few things I didn't know about her.

Posted by brittany.barden (anonymous) on September 23, 2008 at 7:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)

If by "unbiased" you choose to ignore the fact that the author is/was a PHC student.

Just a fact.

Posted by phcpravda (anonymous) on September 23, 2008 at 9:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I'm as cynical as the next guy (probably more than the next guy, in fact; and I'm quite aware of the happenings of Spring 2006, having been there myself), but to be quite honest, I don't know that it's possible for an article like this to be biased. That is, this is just an article seeking to reveal the personality and philosophy of a local professional, not a hard-hitting or "revealing" interrogation seeking to "expose," clarify, or otherwise embarrass a future President, for example. Dr. Libby has nothing to prove, and the Washington Post should have nothing to prove with this article. It shouldn't have "tough" or unbiased-so-called questions.

In this case, I would be offended on behalf of Dr. Libby if "hard" questions were asked. This isn't an expose, but a personal profile.

So, on that note, great article: I hope this column interviews a few other familiar faces. And to the rest of you: stop trying to conjure arguments and bitter emotions where they do not belong.

Posted by brgingerich (anonymous) on September 23, 2008 at 11:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)

"If by "unbiased" you choose to ignore the fact that the author is/was a PHC student.
Just a fact."

Wow, how did you uncover this "fact", Sherlock? I think there just might be a Pulitzer with you rname on it.

Posted by Dingus2 (anonymous) on September 24, 2008 at 7:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Chill out, all of you. Some things never change.

P.S. Good job, Charity :P

Posted by davidthereporter (anonymous) on September 24, 2008 at 12:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Not hard to find out about someone if you can use "the google"!

"About the author
Charity Corkey is a senior journalism major at Patrick Henry College and works part-time in HSLDA's Communications Department."

http://hslda.org/courtreport/V24N3/V24N3...

Posted by octamatilda (anonymous) on September 24, 2008 at 12:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Wow, I wonder if Bob Woodward ever uses Google. Brilliant.

Posted by Dingus2 (anonymous) on September 24, 2008 at 1:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)

It is pretty weak that the author wasn't identified as a student, past or present, of Patrick Henry. No wonder the questions were kinda softball.
.
Don't be a dingus- check your facts before you lather praise on puff journalism. Especially if you are going to preemptively attack an imagined enemy.

Posted by AFF3 (anonymous) on September 24, 2008 at 7:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Dingus: "Wow, I wonder if Bob Woodward ever uses Google. Brilliant."
My point exactly--anybody can google a name. It takes no effort, no talent, no training. Yes, even I can claim those traits!

Posted by octamatilda (anonymous) on September 24, 2008 at 8:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Going to a school disqualifies you from ever writing anything about it?

A school is a kind of community. If someone lives in a town or city, and writes a profile on the mayor, is it automatically biased in his favor?

Maybe there should have been a note to the readers that the reporter is a former student, but that doesn't mean the story is just "fluff." It will depend on the circumstances. As someone already pointed out, this is a personal profile, not Hardball with Chris Matthews.

Louiebird and pravda, what do you do in your spare time? Heckle little league players? Make fun of fat kids? Come on.

Posted by ekhill (anonymous) on September 24, 2008 at 10:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Sheesh, is this what the Washington Post is coming to? Allowing "reporters" not to disclose their relationships?

If this "reporter" attends PHC and works for HSLDA, they are beholden to this group. Sad.

This is a total disgrace.

Posted by louiebird (anonymous) on October 1, 2008 at 2:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password:
(Forgotten your password?)


Comment:

Deal of the Day

Take 10% Off Baby Ballerina!

Take a 10% discount off the 10 week Winter Session at Baby Ballerina. The session runs from January 5th - ...

View all deals from Baby Ballerina | All deals

Latest Deal

• Get 50% Off Laser Hair Removal at Radiance! posted: 1/6/09

Search Deals and Business Directory

Your Thoughts...

Will you make a New Year's resolution this year?

View results

Most...

Viewed
Commented
E-mailed